“While We’re Young” is a film that explores universally
relatable themes of aging, truth, and pride.
The story focuses on Josh (Ben Stiller) and Cornelia (Naomi Watts), a
middle-aged married couple that desperately attempts to avoid the inevitable
burdens that accompany the aging process.
Josh teaches by night and attempts to produce earnest documentaries that
prioritze adherence to truth above all else. Fletcher (Adam Horovitz) and Darby
(Amanda Seyfried), a young and vivacious hipster couple, sit in on one of
Josh’s classes and Fletcher introduces himself as a fan of Josh’s first, more
critically acclaimed, documentary. When
the two couples dine out together, Josh and Cornelia are enthralled by Fletcher
and Darby’s carefree spontaneity, while Fletcher and Darby appreciate how their
older and more well-off counterparts can foot the dinner bill. The film explores the evolving aspects of the
relationship and the professional careers of Josh and Fletcher.
No other film I’ve seen has captured the hipster ethos more
accurately than “While We’re Young.”
Brooklyn, VHS tapes, vinyl records, fedoras, skinny jeans, and beach
parties in the city streets characterized Fletcher and the effect Fletcher has
on Josh. This hipster motif provided great opportunities for Stiller to flex
his comedic muscles, which were unfortunately underwhelming. The hip-hop dance classes Darby attends may
or may not be hipster influenced (I’m no authority on hipster culture). Regardless, Cornelia, who is the only one in
her circle of ‘older’ friends to not have a child and is growing apart from the
baby-crazy moms, attends a dance class with Darby rather than sitting through
another enervating mommy-baby musical sing-alongs with her aforementioned
circle of friends.
A unique soundtrack that includes orchestral string music in
addition to classics “Hit Em Up” by Tupac and “Buggin Out” by A Tribe Called
Quest helps compensate for a visually dull cinematic experience. Aside from the hustle and bustle of a few
city scenes, the film forgoes engaging aesthetics in favor of dialogue. And while the dialogue offers insight by
punctuating the film’s themes, many of the conversations seemed contrived to
achieve that very purpose. It was not believable for the characters,
within the context of their situations, to carry out such philosophical
ramblings.
2/4 Stars
No comments:
Post a Comment